The paper 'How the Stress Causes Either a Decrease or Increase of Relationship Functions?' is an outstanding example of a research proposal on psychology.
A lot of research about the causes as well as the management of stress either in the workplace or at home exist. However, there is limited research on the correlation between stress and romantic relationship functions such as communication, physical and physical affection. This paper seeks to investigate how stress causes either a decrease or increase relationship functions.
The topic is important because it seeks to investigate the relationship between stress and relationship functions. The findings for the study will be imperative because they will help people in a romantic relationship to formulate strategies to address the stressing factors which increase or decrease the romantic functions such as communication and physical affection.
Aloia and Brecht (2017) examined the indicators of patients’ psychological health which influences affection communication as well as emotional intelligence. They found out that stress affects the way people express affection. Besides, they found out that received affection enhances mental health as well as self-esteem. The research proposal adds to their work by investigating how stress and depression affect relationship functions (communication and physical affection).
Manne and Badr(2010) argue that couples with head and neck cancers are vulnerable to psychological as well as relationship distress. The authors also note that the patients found to have with the lung, neck or head cancers have high suicide rates compared to those suffering from other cancer types. Lung cancer patients, the depression distress rates range 15-35% and 34.6% for emotional distress. The contributing factors for these high distress rates include difficulties with speaking, eating, breathing and swallowing, body concerns and disfigured face. Their work is therefore essential to the topic because it explains the causes of stress. Cancer and its effects such as the inability to speak and the disfigured face due to surgeries tend to affect the relationship functions communication and physical affection among couples. The research proposal adds to the work of Manne and Badr by investigating whether they increase or decrease the romantic functions.
Wersebe et al. (2018) argue that Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is an effective intervention to improve well-being as well as to minimize distress. Their work relates to the topic in that it provides one of the ways to deal with stress to ensure a healthy relationship. The research proposal adds to the work of Wersebe et al. by investing how stress relates to relationship functions (communication and physical affection).
Floyd and Riforgiate (2008) found out that adverse mental, as well as physical stress, can affect the way partners express affection. Their work, therefore, relates to the topic because the topic is about the influence of stress on the relationship functions such as communication and physical affection. The research proposal adds their work by investigating how stress affects communication between partners.
Pistole, Roberts, and Chapman (2010) in their study found that long geographical distance partners suffer from stress due to the separation as well as travel tensions (pg 536). Besides, the long-distance between partners makes it challenging to maintain the relationship. The work relates to the topic in that it explains the factors responsible for weakened relationship functions. These factors are separation and travel tensions. The research proposal will add to Pistole, Roberts and Chapman's work by investigating how the separation of partners correlates with the functions of a relationship.
Hill and Flanagan (2015) surveyed how love relates to depression. They found out that people receive less love have high depression levels. The research proposal adds to their work by investigating the correlation between depression and relationship functions.
What is the correlation between stress and relationship functions? The level of stress is likely to increase or decrease relationship function. High levels of stress are likely to reduce both communication and physical affection among people in romantic relationships.
The research will use a correlational research design. The first variable will be the correlation between stress and romantic relationship function. The second variable is about the effects of stress and depression on relationship function. The last variable will be how the separation of partners correlates with communication and physical affection.
The study sample will involve African-American couples aged between 18 and 30years who are in a romantic relationship and are either working or studying. This sample is appropriate for the study because it is likely to give more reliable results that will help to investigate the causes of stress in a relationship for partners in a long-distance relationship and the correlation between stress and relationship functions (communication and physical affection).
The participants will be issued with a Love experience questionnaire to assess the amount of love they receive. The questionnaire will also assess how stress and depression affect their communication and physical affection. The outcome of the study will help the researcher to collect and analyze data about their correlation of stress and depression on the relationship functions. The variables will be measured using means, standard deviations, alphas, and correlations.
The researcher will use a correlational study design. The first variable will be the correlation between stress and romantic relationship function. The second variable is about the effects of stress and depression on relationship function. The last variable will be how the separation of partners correlates with communication and physical affection.
Results and Discussions
Stress is likely to be correlated with a decrease in communication and physical affection among African-American couples. The separation of partners is likely to interfere with communication whereas travel tensions are likely to diminish physical affection for the partners since most of them are far from each other. The study will have statistical tests such as the mean for partners experiencing high levels of stress in their relationship. Besides, there will be a correlation test for the correlation between stress and the functions of a relationship. The outcome of the study is likely to be a decrease in the correlation between stress and relationship functions. The findings for the research will add to the field of psychology in that it will address how stress contributes to poor relationship functions among African-American couples.
Aloia, L., & Brecht, D. (2017). Psychological Well-Being as a Function of Affectionate Communication and Emotional Intelligence. Communication Research Reports, 34(4), 297-306. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2017.1350570
Hill, L, and Flanagan, C. (2015). Love is a battlefield: the experience of love in relation to depression. Modern Psychological Studies: Vol. 21: No. 1, Article 5. Available at: https://scholar.utc.edu/mps/vol21/iss1/5
Floyd, K., & Riforgiate, S. (2008). Affectionate Communication Received from Spouses Predicts Stress Hormone Levels in Healthy Adults. Communication Monographs, 75(4), 351-368. doi: 10.1080/03637750802512371
Manne, S., & Badr, H. (2010). Intimacy Processes and Psychological Distress among Couples Coping with Head and Neck or Lung Cancers. Psycho-Oncology, 19(9), 941–954. http://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1645
Pistole, M., Roberts, A., & Chapman, M. (2010). Attachment, relationship maintenance, and stress in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Journal of Social And Personal Relationships, 27(4), 535-552. doi: 10.1177/0265407510363427
Wersebe, H, Lieb, R, Meyer,.A, Hofer,.P, Gloster, A. (2018). The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy self-help intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.09.002