The paper "Korean Education System" is an outstanding example of an education research proposal.
The Korean education system is in crisis. Students and pupils are continuously becoming estranged from their education. Teachers have also lost pride in and pleasure from teaching; hence, they have been forced out because of bureaucratic restructuring. Moreover, there is great concern from parents in relation to their children’s happiness. Besides being concerned about their children’s low quality of education in the country (Lew, 2006).
What is more, there is an explicit disparity in the quality of education attained by children from rich families and those from poor economic backgrounds. This is because the rich take their children to private schools while the poor ones take theirs to public schools. Consequently, poor students and parents are increasingly becoming desperate for a better education because of the widening gap in the Korean education system (Seth, 2002).).
Furthermore, according to Dronkers (2010), the Korean system is in crisis because of the high competition between private and public schools. Many people believe that their children can succeed in private and tuition-based institutions than in public schools. Therefore, a majority of them have decided to transfer their children to private schools. As a result, many poor parents are left worrying about their children’s academic fate since they cannot afford to pay for expensive private education. There are arguments that private education offers high-quality education, and get more enrollments in universities than public schools (Seth 2010).
The wonderful educational enthusiasm of parents has led to the world’s highest literacy rate and calculative skills. For instance, according to the results of the PISA test, Korean students are the highest achievers. This is evidenced by the fact that Korean students the highest achievers in the PISA test (Development, 2010). Nonetheless, this education system suppresses students’ imagination and creativity. Therefore, there is an urgent need for keeping up with the global competition by improving the present education system (Dronkers, 2010).
This study is instrumental in fully understand the kind of problem that Korean education is facing. This is in relation to the emphasis given to university entrance and pursuance of private education, rather than focusing on the development of a whole individual to fit in the competitive world. This, further, concerns the kind of missions that private education and public schools are pursuing.
What is the impact of the highly competitive ethos of Korean education- in schools, on students and parents?
1. How is the Korean education currently viewed by school managers, teachers, students, and parents?
What is the role of education in Korea?
What do parents prioritize and why?
What do students prioritize and why?
2. What is the difference between private schools and public schools in Korea?
What is the impact of this difference on parents, teachers, and students?
3. What pressure does the highly competitive ethos of Korean education have on young people and their parents?
I will engage in Korean literature and others that are relevant to my study. They will mostly compromise of topics that will help me unveil my research questions. These include:
I. Difference between public schools and private schools
II. Teaching quality in private and public schools
III. The curriculum in the Korean education system
IV. Leadership in the Korean education system
V. The emotional well-being of young people
VI. Competition of public and private education in Korea
The main focus of the meeting was to get guidelines with the professor the most realistic and feasible research questions for my Ph.D.
Going through the rationale, professors emphasized the importance of evidence of my arguments.
She noted that my proposed questions were too many and that some were not suitably researching questions.
She guided me through how to formulate research questions while giving examples of already completed studies
She advised on the left out the part concerning character education and suggested the most appropriate research questions.
She guided me on how to write a Ph.D. by using her own example and others.
She stressed the significance of having a time table.
We discussed how to go about the literature review and possible literature review body.
We discussed data collection and potential areas of collecting it.
to identify the main key research question and draft a short piece (no longer than two A4 sides)
to write a clear rationale for my research topic and study questions
to support my rationale with concrete references
to indicate potential literature bodies relevant to my area of study
to decide on the sample sizes and the possible participants
to create a timescale for my research
Lew, J. (2006). Asian Americans in Class. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Seth, M. (2002). Education Fever. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Seth, M. (2010). A History of Korea. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Development, O. (2010). PISA PISA Computer-Based Assessment of Student Skills in Science. Paris: OECD publishing.
Dronkers, J. (2010). Quality and Inequality of Education. Berlin: Springer.